Tag Archives: time and chronology

Post 4 – A wrinkle in time

There are many ways to bend time to tell your story.

Ferrante breaks the chronology of the story for a second time at the beginning of volume 2. The author makes two jumps at once, one back to 2010 (or maybe now it’s 2011 since it has taken some time to write the first volume) and one that jumps from the wedding in 1960, when Lila and Lenù are 16 years old, to 1966, when Lenù, who reveals her inner thoughts (to the extent she can) to the reader, feels that she and Lila are estranged and their relationship at its worst point. To her surprise, Lila shows up and hands her a well-tied-up collection of personal notebooks, which she must hold for Lila but has to pledge not to read. Of course Lenù begins reading them immediately (could Lila have possibly thought otherwise) and cannot resist continuing, even after they upset her. At some point, after reading, rereading and even memorizing some of what Lila wrote, Lenù dumps the books into the river over a bridge. Thus Ferrante has set up the scenario so that Lenù, writing about Lila, has gained access to Lila’s own descriptions of her though processes and even her revelations of those processes. Or, to be precise, she has her memory of what she read of Lila’s notebooks as her now (2010) more reliable insight into Lila’s own thoughts and feelings, as filtered through her own selective memory. She makes some revisions of Lenù’s own earlier reaction to, for example, Lila’s letter to her when she is on Ischia, which she then evaluated as an act of spontaneous genius. After reading the notebooks she realizes that Lila worked out much of her thinking and all of her formulations before she wrote the letter, that her friend might still be a self-taught genius, but even geniuses have to put in hard work, the result comes not through magic. The notebooks also reveal the utter misery of Lila’s life despite her relative luxury and her ability to make her husband give her money or support her whims, so when Lenù resumes the story she can believably tell it and let all us readers know how Lila feels although Lila is hiding much of those feelings from the others present. The treason of her husband, revealed on the wedding night by his subservience to his own ambitions (and thus to maintaining good relations with the Solaras at Lila’s cost), followed by his rape of a furious, unhappy and unwilling Lila (there is no sign up to now, indeed, up through volume 3, that Lila has any pleasure from sex, only pain and humiliation), has poisoned the marriage. Ferrante is able to do this through her jump through time and by referencing the notebooks.

The conceit of a discovered diary or set of notebooks is a useful one for an author. I put one (it fits the character) in my own novel, though I’m not sure if I’ll keep it. How, when you have one main narrator, to open up another. I got a text from my sister last week wishing that our mother had kept a diary recording her thoughts at various key moments of her life (Mom, like Lenù, was an ace student but forced to go to work at 15 — all three of her children spent at least some time in graduate school, which she helped get us to).

Back to the Future

In the very first chapter of The Story of a New Name, Elena skips ahead a few years before returning to the chronological order. In the leap forward in time, Elena is describing a time when she is distanced from the neighbourhood and her relationship with Lila she sees as being “terrible”, but polite (page 15, The Story of a New Name). Lila has given Lenù journals that she has written about her life the past few years, and the neighbourhood. Another major time the chronology has been disrupted is in the first novel when Elena writes of Lila telling her about the dissolving borders the first time it happened on new years eve 1958, which she does not tell Lenù about until 1980.

Both times, Elena is recounting finding out some inner secrets and confidence of Lila’s. Except for these breaks in chronology, the novels are told exclusively from from Lenù perspective at the time, never revealing future events, so these breaks are very significant. Yet they are never fast forwards to Lenù’s life, they are always about Lila. They reveal very little about the situation or life Lenù is living in that time, sticking with the method throughout the books of only describing her feelings at that certain time, and never disclosing what she knows will happen in the future until it actually does happen.

Is This Now, or Is This Then?

November 24, 1954:  Actress Pier Angeli and singer Vic Damone were married  from 1954-1958 ..... (Wife # 1)
Pier Angeli with husband Vic Damone, St. Timothy’s Church, Los Angeles, 1954. Alamy stock photo.

The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” – William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun

“You must learn some of my philosophy. Think only of the past as its remembrance gives you pleasure.” – Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice

“I used to think this was the beginning of your story. Memory is a strange thing, it doesn’t work like I thought it did. We are so bound by time, by its order.” – Amy Adams, speaking to her daughter at her birth, in Arrival

Apparently it is not only Walter Benjamin who sees time as porous, though he speaks specifically of Naples, and he confines the porosity to days within a week, not to a mix of past and present: “…[T]he festival penetrates each and every working day….A grain of Sunday is hidden in each weekday, and how much weekday in this Sunday!” However, implied throughout “Naples” is the sense of the Neapolitans’ way of life as being from the past. Ferrante/Elena (F/E) feels the past so keenly that she says to herself, in My Brilliant Friend‘s prologue, “We’ll see who wins this time” (23), as she begins to write her and Lila’s history. On a personal note, as someone who has been around for a while, I can testify that Faulkner’s words ring true. And as for Austen…well, chin up, old girl, it ain’t happening here.

As she does in the first volume, F/E disrupts the chronology when she begins the second volume, Story of a New Name. After the prologue of My Brilliant Friend, F/E disrupts the chronology a few more times around key events. The chronology is so complex (to me) that I don’t want to attempt it in this blog. I’ll limit the discussion to a couple disruptions: immediately after the brief account of the doll-throwing incident the narration switches, to go back in time to give the reader context and come back to that day. Later, the author(s) fast forwards to the stone throwing incident and jumps back again.

The Story of a New Name, unlike My Brilliant Friend, is not divided into a prologue and several chronological books. Rather, the author(s) dives right in; the story simply resumes. The way the chapters are only signaled by modest little numbers that do not even begin on a new page adds to the feeling that we are simply and immediately being plunged into the action in New Name. And while volume I is divided into two chronological sections- “Childhood” and “Adolescence,” in New Name one chapter simply follows another.

Chapter 1 takes place in 1966 in the framework of Elena again looking back from the present, to when Lila gave her a box of notebooks. The notebooks record events from before 1966, so again the narration takes a step backward as Elena describes some of their contents. The last episode in the notebooks that Elena refers to, before she pushes the box into the river, is Marcello Solara’s showing up at the wedding wearing the shoes – which the first volume closed with.

Then chapter 2 begins, immediately jumping back to that same moment/sequence, Elena continuing the story with only the information she had that day, not adding what the notebooks tell her. We do not return to 1966; and she does not use information from the notebooks till much later in this volume — with the notable exception, in chapters 6-8, of Stefano’s brutal rape of Lila on their wedding night and their return to Naples. In chapter 9, Elena’s eyewitness account resumes.

Time is fluid, not just porous; F/E is omniscient, and that omniscience is slowly revealing itself; she knows the story so well that she can easily disrupt the chronology at key points. In Arrival, Amy Adams’ character actually begins to experience time as the visiting aliens do: not as linear, but as looping in on itself, taking you with it so that one moment is “now” and the next is “then,” and so “now” becomes the future.